Assessment 4: Game Development

Dragon 21

During the ITS OOPS project participants will work in groups to develop a game using KNP and keep a log book of their process during the project. 

The nature of participants game is entirely up to them, however students should be encouraged to try to choose something they can finish. Some marks will be allocated for the level of completion, as this indicates their competency in Top Down Design. However, this is and exploratory work and students should not fail just because their work is incomplete. 

The log book kept by participants should detail their planning, any problems they faced and any solutions they found. It should also detail each participants roles in production. 

The project should be assessed both on the basis of innovation, extent and standard of completion. This will be assessed by evaluating finished products. Students should  also receive marks on the basis of  the level of detail recorded about their development process. This will be assessed through review of their log books.

 

Project  VHA HA SA LA VLA
Project 

 

 

Very well designed project showing excellent ability to  conceptualise design issues, excellent appreciation of project time constraints, a high level of  knowledge of group skill levels, excellent understanding of technical issues and demonstrating excellent and innovative design. Well designed project showing good ability to  conceptualise design issues. good appreciation of project time constraints, sound appreciation of group skill levels, good understanding of technical issues and demonstrating innovative design. Effectively  designed project showing reasonable ability to  conceptualise design issues,  reasonable appreciation of time constraints, general appreciation of group skill levels, reasonable understanding of technical issues and demonstrating good design.. Simply designed project demonstrating basic ability to conceptualise design issues, basic appreciation of  time constraints, some appreciation of   group skill levels, some understanding of technical issues and demonstrating reasonable design. Poorly designed project demonstrating little ability to  conceptualise design issues, inadequate appreciation of time constraints, almost no appreciation of   group skill levels,  and lack of evidence of  understanding of technical issues and demonstrating poor design.
Report

 

Very well designed project report showing excellent ability to  conceptualise game design, a high level of  schematic planning, excellent understanding of design issues. Well designed project report  showing good ability to  conceptualise game design, sound appreciation of schematic planning, good understanding of design issues. Effectively  designed project report  showing reasonable ability to  conceptualise  game design, general appreciation of schematic planning, reasonable understanding of design issues. Simply designed project report demonstrating basic ability to conceptualise game design, some appreciation of   schematic planning, some understanding of design issues. Poorly designed project report demonstrating little ability to  conceptualise game design, almost no appreciation of   schematic planning,  and lack of evidence of  understanding of design issues. issues.
Overall Project and Report Very well designed  project  showing excellent quality in design and  presentation, demonstrating high quality  schematic concepts, innovative design and excellent graphic use.

Excellent Project Report  with well above average  schematic explanations, high quality grammar and spelling and excellent presentation.

Well designed  project  showing very good quality in design and  presentation, sound  schematic concepts, very good design and graphic use.

Very good Project Report  with above average  schematic explanations, good quality grammar and spelling and very good presentation.

Effectively  designed project  showing good quality in design and  presentation, thoughtful schematic concepts, good design and graphic use

Good Project Report  with reasonable  schematic explanations, careful grammar and spelling and good presentation.

Simply designed project  demonstrating basic ability in design and  presentation, some appreciation of   schematic concepts, adequate design and graphic use

Simple Project Report  with some  schematic explanations, limited quality in grammar and spelling and reasonable presentation.

Poorly designed project  demonstrating little ability in design and  presentation, almost no    schematic planning,  poor design and ineffective graphic use.

Poor Project Report  with very few  schematic explanations, poor quality grammar and spelling and poor presentation.

Visit An Area

Technophile_City_(INFOTECH)The_Time_Machine_(HISTORY)  |  The_Tree_House_(SOSE)Lessons_Index   |  Assessment_Instruments  |  Maps   |  Power Point   |  Proforma  |  Links  |  Gallery  |  Games  |  Humour   |  Prizes  |  WebRings  |  Soapbox  |  Search_Engines  |  Site_ Map_ |

.

             Search OzEdweb by Keyword   

.CLICK ME TO VIEW FRAMES ALL_RIGHTS_RESERVED  OZEDWEB-©-VIRTUAL OZ  HOME